Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.54 ounces | -- |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a little bit better than Galaxy S7 edge, getting a general score of 82.2 against 78.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has 14 version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) body is a lot lighter and way thinner than Galaxy S7 edge.
Galaxy S7 edge features a much better processing power than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 12 GB lesser RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a much better looking display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.