Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black and Epi Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 534 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge has a general score of 78.1, which is a little bit better than the Honor Magic 6 Pro's 76.6 global score. The Galaxy S7 edge construction is incredibly lighter and thinner than Honor Magic 6 Pro. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy S7 edge has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Honor Magic 6 Pro has Android 14.
The Galaxy S7 edge features a bit better looking screen than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a better processing unit than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same video quality, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and videos, a much more megapixels back-facing camera, better video frame rate and a way larger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.