Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black and Epi Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 534 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is a little bit better than the Honor Magic6 Pro, getting a score of 78.1 against 76.6. The Galaxy S7 edge is a lighter and thinner phone than Honor Magic6 Pro. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while Honor Magic6 Pro has Android 14 version, so it provides some nice extra features and better performance.
The Honor Magic6 Pro has a faster CPU than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more cpu cores and 8 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a little sharper display than Honor Magic6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel count in each inch in the screen and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same video quality, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has a much larger sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality, higher 60 fps video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a back-facing camera with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The Honor Magic6 Pro has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.