Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-03-11 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge has an overall score of 78.1, which is just a bit better than LG G7 Fit's 77 global score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S7 edge has an older 8.0 Oreo version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Galaxy S7 edge is a incredibly older and just a little heavier cellphone than the LG G7 Fit, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit thinner anyway.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Quad-Core CPU. LG G7 Fit features a sharper screen than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a just a bit better pixel density and a bit bigger display.
LG G7 Fit has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S7 edge has greater battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG G7 Fit counts with a camera that's just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although the LG G7 Fit has a lot smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos and a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, it also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.