Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than LG K52, getting a global score of 78.1 against 76. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while LG K52 has Android 10 version, providing the user some extra features and performance optimizations. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S7 edge is incredibly older than LG K52, it's design is just a little thinner and lighter.
LG K52 features a bit superior processor than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the LG K52 also has a greater number of cores (and faster). Galaxy S7 edge features a much better looking display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2560px resolution and way more pixels per screen inch.
The LG K52 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage. LG K52 captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the LG K52 also counts with a much more mega pixels camera and a larger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
The LG K52 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.