Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's general score of 78.1. The LG K92 body is newer than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's, although it is just a bit thicker and a lot heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but LG K92 has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy S7 edge has a slightly better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. LG K92 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM.
LG K92 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG K92 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG K92 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The LG K92 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
The LG K92 costs more money than Galaxy S7 edge, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.