Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, getting a general score of 87.6 against 78.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the LG V60 ThinQ is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, it is thicker and noticeably heavier.
The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bit better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. LG V60 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a much more mega pixels camera, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much better video quality.
LG V60 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. LG V60 ThinQ has a superior battery life than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V60 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the Galaxy S7 edge.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.