Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, having a global score of 84.7 against 78.1. Motorola Edge (2022)'s body is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's, but it's a bit thicker and a bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge (2022) has an older 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S7 edge has a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge (2022) shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 39% more battery size.
The Motorola Edge (2022) costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.