Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, getting a 78.5 score against 78.1. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a just a little bit heavier device than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, but they are 0.3inches thick. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has the previous 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit worse pixels amount in each inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory and lesser processing cores (although they are faster).
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light captures, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution, a lot better video quality and a way bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.