Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is slightly better than Galaxy S7 edge's overall score of 78.1. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro body is newer, but thicker and incredibly heavier than the Galaxy S7 edge. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less cpu cores (but faster). The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot lower pixel amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 28% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.