Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than Galaxy S7 edge, having a overall score of 86.3 against 78.1. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the older 14 version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro body is extremely newer than the Galaxy S7 edge's, although it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a lot less pixels per inch of screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and lesser RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures, a way more MP camera and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.