Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2023-06-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a global score of 78.1, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is older than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's construction is somewhat thinner and much lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13.
Galaxy S7 edge has a way better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. Galaxy S7 edge counts with a much better looking screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels amount per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 39 percent larger battery capacity.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a superior camera than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and a lot tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.