Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, having a score of 86.2 against 78.1. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Moto G200 5G is a incredibly newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, but it is much heavier and thicker.
Moto G200 5G has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Moto G200 5G has a better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a way better battery performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 39 percent larger battery size.
Moto G200 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.