Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G60s is slightly better than the Galaxy S7 edge, having a general score of 79.9 against 78.1. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G60s has older 11 version and Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Motorola Moto G60s is a extremely thicker and incredibly heavier device than Galaxy S7 edge.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel density. The Motorola Moto G60s counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G60s has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a greater number of cores (but slower). Moto G60s has a much better camera than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the Moto G60s also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The Motorola Moto G60s has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.