Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G71 5G has an overall score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's 78.1 score. These phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G71 5G has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though Motorola Moto G71 5G is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, it's a little bit thicker and heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch of screen. The Moto G71 5G counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Moto G71 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores. Moto G71 5G shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light images, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G71 5G also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and better video frame rates.
The Moto G71 5G has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.