Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-11 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a global score of 78.1 against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's design is older, thicker and a bit heavier than Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little faster processor than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has 4 more cores.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S7 edge. Both of them have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the same screen pixels density and a same size screen. Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels back facing camera, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy S7 edge also has a larger diafragm aperture and a larger camera sensor.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S7 edge not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.