Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-11 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge has a score of 78.1, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's overall score of 76.3. Galaxy S7 edge's construction is older, a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a slightly better screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Moto Z3 Play counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S7 edge features just a little better performance than Moto Z3 Play, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have the same RAM amount.
Galaxy S7 edge shoots a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a same size aperture, a same resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy S7 edge also has a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy S7 edge counts with better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.