Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a general score of 79.8, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's overall score of 78.1. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola One Hyper has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Motorola One Hyper is a a lot newer phone than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, although it is somewhat thicker and heavier.
The Galaxy S7 edge features a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater display density. Motorola One Hyper counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Hyper also has more CPU cores. The Motorola One Hyper features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
The Motorola One Hyper takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much more mega-pixels back camera.
The Motorola One Hyper is a bit more expensive than the Galaxy S7 edge, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.