Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 15 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 534 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a general score of 79.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 edge's 78.1 general score. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has 15 version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) construction is incredibly newer and much thinner than Galaxy S7 edge's, although it's incredibly heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a really smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S7 edge has a very superior processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4700mAh battery size. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot higher 50 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.