Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a general score of 78.1 against 75.8. Galaxy S7 edge is an a lot older device than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's thinner and a lot lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features just a bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a greater number of faster cores and more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot higher video quality, a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.