Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a general score of 78.1 against 77. Galaxy S7 edge's construction has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, but it is lighter. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a better camera than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S7 edge has a way better battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.