Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.54 ounces | -- |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 has an overall score of 82.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 edge's 78.1 global score. Galaxy A34's body is lighter and way thinner than the Galaxy S7 edge. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A34 has the older 13 version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A34 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy A34 also has a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much higher 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy S7 edge features a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 200 GB. The Galaxy A34 has a way better battery life than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.