Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, with a 91.3 score against 78.1. These phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much newer than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, it's heavier and just a little thicker.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a higher number of 2200 megahertz cores. The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a much larger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.