Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, having an 88.1 score against 78.1. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy F62 design is noticeably newer, but way heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge.
The Galaxy S7 edge has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy F62 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking photographs and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 64 MP resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.