Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2022-07-01 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G52 GPU |
| 9 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M13 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, with a overall score of 81.1 against 78.1. Samsung Galaxy M13's design is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's, although it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M13 has an older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M13, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M13, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 200 GB.
The Galaxy M13 counts with a superior performance than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy M13 also has more processing cores. The Galaxy M13 has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh. The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M13, because although it has a lot less megapixels back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.