Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, getting a 78.9 score against 78.1. Both devices in this comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy M20 has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy M20's design is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's, although it is somewhat thicker and heavier.
The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy M20, although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel density.
The Galaxy S7 edge takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments and a much better (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy M20 has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M20 counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 39 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.