Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Galaxy S7 edge, with a global score of 89 against 78.1. Samsung Galaxy Note10's construction is newer than Galaxy S7 edge's, although it's just a bit heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy S7 edge features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy Note10 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a larger number of faster cores and more RAM. The Galaxy Note10 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy Note10 also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate and a larger camera aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 3 percent more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy S7 edge, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S7 edge. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy S7 edge, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.