Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Galaxy S7 edge, getting an 89.7 score against 78.1. Galaxy S10 Lite is a a lot newer cellphone than Galaxy S7 edge, but it is heavier and a little bit thicker. Galaxy S10 Lite features a little faster CPU than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 edge features a little more vivid display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates, a way better resolution camera in the back and a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy S10 Lite has greater battery life than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10 Lite is also a lot cheaper, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.