Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a global score of 78.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's overall score of 77.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is incredibly older than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's design is way thinner and notably lighter. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12, providing some additional features and performance improvements.
Galaxy S7 edge has a really superior processing power than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has lesser processing cores (but faster) and 2 GB less RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a better screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S7 edge takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.