Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than Galaxy S7 edge, getting a overall score of 85.6 against 78.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction is noticeably newer and a bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than Galaxy S7 edge. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the older 11 version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the Galaxy S7 edge also has a bigger aperture.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S7 edge, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S7 edge. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S7 edge, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.