Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is much better than the Galaxy S7 edge's 78.1 global score. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a extremely newer device than the Galaxy S7 edge, but it's notably heavier and extremely thicker. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the older 10 version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge and the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro have really similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a just a little lower quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a larger screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and higher video frame rate.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 39% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.