Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2024-07-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a global score of 84.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy S7 edge's 78.1 general score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has older 14 version and Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a incredibly newer and extremely thinner phone than the Galaxy S7 edge, but it's heavier.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a really bigger display and a higher 2224 x 2488 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a way better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a lot better camera than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way more MP back camera and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.