Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has an overall score of 82.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's general score of 78.1. Although it's the best we are comparing here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has just a little better performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy S7 edge shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a way worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video and a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.