Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge has a general score of 78.1, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's overall score of 77.1. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, so it counts with lots of additional features and performance tweaks. Galaxy S7 edge is a a bit thinner and extremely lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 2080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy S7 edge features a very superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with much more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.