Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 edge's overall score of 78.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is newer, but thicker and a lot heavier than the Galaxy S7 edge.
The Galaxy S7 edge features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.