Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7, getting a overall score of 93.3 against 79.5. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro body is much newer and a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7's, but it's also noticeably heavier. The Galaxy S7 has a little more vivid screen than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and much darker display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixel quantity per inch of screen.
IPhone 13 Pro features more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. IPhone 13 Pro has a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 64-bits processor, a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has 3095mAh of battery capacity. The iPhone 13 Pro captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7, and although they both have a 12 MP back-facing camera and the same video definition, the iPhone 13 Pro also has faster video frame rates and a larger aperture for better images in poorly lited situations.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone 13 Pro, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy S7, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.