Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7's 79.5 overall score. The iPhone 13 Pro Max construction is much newer and just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7's, but it is also heavier. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a superior processing power than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger number of cores, a 64-bit CPU and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S7 features a bit sharper screen than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch in the display. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a 12 megapixels back camera, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 4352mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S7. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy S7, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.