Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Obsidian and Porcelain |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | -- |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 2700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 4.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), with a overall score of 79.5 against 76.7. Galaxy S7 features a much more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 12 GB less RAM and lesser cores. The Galaxy S7 counts with a way better looking screen than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lot more opaque display and a much smaller display.
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4650mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.