Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7, having a score of 81.9 against 79.5. Google Pixel 4's construction is extremely newer, but just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7. The Google Pixel 4 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster).
The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater count of pixels per display inch. Google Pixel 4 has a camera that is very similar to the Galaxy S7 one, because although the Google Pixel 4 has a tinier camera sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, it also counts with a camera in the back with more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 200 GB. The Galaxy S7 features a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7 percent more battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, else you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy S7, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.