Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is much better than the Galaxy S7's 79.5 overall score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a much newer cellphone than the Galaxy S7, but it is just a bit heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy S7 features a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher display density.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit superior processor than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy S7, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.