Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a general score of 82.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S7's 79.5 general score. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s design is extremely thinner and extremely lighter than Galaxy S7. Galaxy S7 features a much powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 4 less CPU cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 features a much sharper screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a lot higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a bit better camera than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much better resolution back camera.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a much better battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 67 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.