Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black and Epi Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 576 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is slightly better than Honor Magic 6 Pro's general score of 76.6. The Galaxy S7 design is much lighter and somewhat thinner than Honor Magic 6 Pro. The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S7 counts with a brighter screen than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a lot bigger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures, a way higher 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger camera aperture.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory. Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.