Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-03-11 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a general score of 79.5, which is a bit better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 overall score. The Galaxy S7 design has the same thickness than the LG G7 Fit, but it is just a bit lighter. The LG G7 Fit has a bit better screen than Galaxy S7, because although it has a quite lower screen density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a little bit more brightness and a bigger screen.
The LG G7 Fit features a much better storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Quad-Core processing unit.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a battery lifetime that's just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy S7. The Galaxy S7 and the LG G7 Fit count with quite similar cameras, because although the LG G7 Fit has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality and a lot smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a back camera with a way higher 16 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.