Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7, with an 82.7 score against 79.5. The LG G8X ThinQ construction is way newer than Samsung Galaxy S7's, although it is just a little thicker and much heavier. The Galaxy S7 counts with a more vivid screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better pixels count per inch in the screen.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. The LG G8X ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture and a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with better video frame rate.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although LG G8X ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S7, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.