Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a general score of 79.5, which is a bit better than LG K52's general score of 76. Although Galaxy S7 is noticeably older than the LG K52, it's body is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner. LG K52 counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the LG K52 also has a greater number of cores.
Galaxy S7 counts with a lot better looking display than LG K52, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way higher screen pixel density. LG K52 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
LG K52 features improved battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. LG K52 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the LG K52 also counts with a way better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.