Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than the LG K62's score of 78.2. Even though Galaxy S7 is notably older than the LG K62, it's construction is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner. Galaxy S7 counts with a much sharper display than LG K62, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixels number per display inch and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
LG K62 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the LG K62 also has a higher number of cores (and also faster). The LG K62 counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
LG K62 takes slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG K62 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
The LG K62 counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.