Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7's score of 79.5. The LG K92 is a much newer device than Samsung Galaxy S7, although it is a little bit thicker and heavier. The Galaxy S7 counts with a much better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
LG K92 has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM. LG K92 counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K92 counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The LG K92 has a lot better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a larger sensor and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the LG K92, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.