Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than LG Q70, having a score of 79.5 against 77.9. The Galaxy S7 design is just a bit thinner and a lot lighter than LG Q70, although it was released 4 years before. The LG Q70 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the LG Q70 also has 4 more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a lot better display than LG Q70, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The LG Q70 has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG Q70 features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. LG Q70 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a way higher 32 mega pixels resolution back camera.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S7 is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.