Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2016-03-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S7's overall score of 79.5. The LG V35 ThinQ is a way newer and just a little thinner phone than the Galaxy S7, although it's also a bit heavier. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S7, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S7 has a little sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density. The LG V35 ThinQ captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and video and a back camera with a lot higher 16 mega-pixels resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory. LG V35 ThinQ features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S7. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S7, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.