Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than the Samsung Galaxy S7, getting a overall score of 87.6 against 79.5. LG V60 ThinQ's construction is newer, but incredibly heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy S7. The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a much better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. LG V60 ThinQ captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a way better video quality and a much bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy S7, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.